WINSTONPENG

A Mind Restless for Meaning

Even as a child, I wrestled with the big existential questions—chiefly, what happens when we die? That sustained fear pushed me toward pursuing symbolic immortality. I threw myself into academia, sports, fights, and the arts, hoping to transform my fear into meaningful struggles. Religion gave me a temporary refuge, but it, too, fell short of offering real answers.

 

Sliding Doors: The Paths Almost Taken

At 18, I declined a government biotech scholarship in France, convinced engineering was my calling. Then, I came close to becoming an SIA cadet pilot—making it to the final ten out of thousands before receiving a telegram citing medical precautionary measures, despite being Athlete of the Year at a top sports school. That decision shook me, a stark reminder of how abruptly life’s journey could end, intensifying my urgency to experience it fully. Desperate for real-world exposure, I accepted an offer from Arthur Andersen—then the world’s leading accounting firm—not out of passion, but to plunge straight into work, compress time, and chase economic success and a primal appreciation of existence on an accelerated path.

 

Learning and Living Risk: From Auditor to Entrepreneur

At Andersen, I immersed myself in financial institution audits, spending my early 20s navigating actuarial models, mastering complex accounting procedures, and engaging directly with senior executives. I learned how financial systems and risk management truly worked, but I found external audits hollow—driven more by deadlines than by deep analysis. At 25, I founded a specialist internal audit firm, working with 30 PLC boards to tackle real issues rather than being confined to external audits constrained by rigid heuristics and superficial evidence gathering. But eventually, auditing and consulting weren’t enough—I wanted to build.
 

Enterprise AI and the Malaysian Innovation Dilemma

In 2009, I created and sold an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) platform powered by Bayesian AI—one of Malaysia’s largest AI-driven risk projects outside banking. Yet, local tech agencies and institutional investors showed little interest, chasing the next Facebook or Twitter instead. Even though the software made it to the top five of the APICTA Awards, decision-makers dismissed it as “not Malaysia’s priority.” This experience reinforced my belief that genuine innovation is often overlooked in a society fixated on safe, conventional ideas at the expense of real progress.
 

I had long advocated for a universal process classification framework for Malaysia—akin to APQC—and a best-practice repository to complement my ERM technology, aiming to revolutionize consulting and make industry knowledge more accessible and actionable. But entrenched mindsets clung to outdated ways, with gatekeepers resisting change to protect their own rice bowl. Instead of pushing against inertia, I will focus on long-term value creation, hoping to see tech transformation emerge as a national aspiration. Malaysia holds far greater potential, and future generations can be significantly uplifted—if we provide them with a stronger springboard to success.

 

The Deeper Question: Why Do Local Innovations Struggle?

In 2013, I stepped in to lead risk management for Southeast Asia’s largest infrastructure project following a ramp collapse, taking over from a Big 4 consulting firm. With the engineering client at the helm, we successfully introduced quantitative risk management—where the previous qualitative approach had failed. This experience reinforced a key insight: innovation only takes hold when it aligns with a community’s culture and way of life. Forcing quantitative ERM onto risk managers who lack the competency to move beyond qualitative methods is like beating a dead horse.

 

Curious about how new ideas gain intellectual acceptance, I turned to the arts and social innovation, drawing from Liane Gabora’s Honing Theory of Creativity and recognizing that cultural context is essential for upstream innovation. To demonstrate art’s role as innovation feedstock, I organized Malaysia’s first National Arts Symposium—featuring eight keynotes and 24 forums over two days, engaging 24 different professions. This led to my appointment to the National Art Gallery’s board, but after three months, I stepped aside, making way for lifelong artists—my goal was never status or committees, but understanding how real change takes root.

 

Advancing Quantitative ERM with Sustainability

In 2017, after my 'cultural enlightenment' on solving innovation, I founded the Society of Certified Risk Professionals (SCRP) to implement the Risk-Innovation-Culture (R-I-C) model—shifting risk management from glorified audits to a true scientific discipline for day-to-day business application. From the outset, SCRP's website made it clear: risk management is a form of management cybernetics, capable of solving problems at any scale.

We launched the Biosphere Roundtable to integrate climate science into risk management, enhancing our quantitative ERM models with science-based inputs. With climate scientists and economists on our Advisory Council, we positioned sustainability as a strategic entry into corporate boardrooms to introduce quantitative ERM. This led to a commission from Malaysia Productivity Corporation to develop a nationwide risk-based regulatory manual and an engagement to drive regulatory changes for online healthcare under the National Regulatory Sandbox. Over time, I took on roles in sustainable logistics and water sector transformation, serving on task forces, research teams, and the Global Water Partnership Malaysia committee.

However, a council of academic, NGO, and regulatory thought leaders alone is not enough to shift financial and corporate bureaucrats, who see themselves as stewards of governance and gatekeepers of control—yet often prioritize authority and financial interests over genuine progress. Quantitative ERM is faster, more cost-effective, and significantly more rational than its qualitative counterpart. Yet, mainstream ERM practitioners resist it—out of self-preservation and deeply ingrained biases.

​

The War Against Gatekeepers

Financial and corporate bureaucrats maintain a firm grip on corporate culture, controlling capital flows and determining who advances. Their network of global consulting firms builds, executes, and audits their agenda within the same sphere of interests, reinforcing their dominance despite inherent conflicts. Yet, since the mid-1990s—when they introduced qualitative ERM—47 of the 50 largest corporate bankruptcies in history have occurred, many involving financial institutions.

Over time, they have reduced organizational systems and management cybernetics to linear checklists that oversimplify complexity, sidelining deeper scientific and cognitive approaches. Meanwhile, boardrooms remain dominated by polished presentations and recycled narratives that do little to drive true innovation and leadership. But the landscape is shifting—AI can now synthesize complex knowledge with greater depth and transparency, challenging these traditional gatekeepers with real management science.

​

What I Am Building Now

I’m developing AI-driven cybernetic systems and blockchain-powered infrastructures, deployed through agile economic frameworks to bypass outdated institutions. By integrating risk management, management cybernetics, and decentralized automation, these systems eliminate inefficiencies and drive real progress. After years of battling corporate and institutional inertia, I’ve learned that these bureaucratic systems don’t evolve—they stagnate and eventually collapse under their own dead weight.

 

I’m focused on the future—building systems that self-optimize, self-govern, and thrive beyond legacy constraints.
 

If you’re a thinker, builder, or disruptor who sees the cracks, let’s connect. The old world is crumbling—let’s build what comes next.